How Much Assessment is Enough?

Assessment: Learning Leads to Excellence

yellow measuring tape - larger canvasThis is the second post on the topic of assessment. In my first post, my main points were:

  1. Healthy individuals take regular stock of their lives: where they’ve been, where they are presently, and where they hope to be in the future. The same is true of organizations.
  2. Assessment is another word for organizational learning. Its essential purpose is to help organizations measure whether they’re fulfilling their mission of changing lives and changing their communities.
  3. Assessment doesn’t just drive excellence; it drives the purpose of Jewish existence as expressed in the synagogue.

Many synagogues are hyper-active so it’s simply impossible to assess all activities. Conducting a comprehensive assessment of some aspect of the synagogue is a resource-intensive undertaking. It takes staff and volunteer time, funding and a commitment to go where the recommendations lead—even if that means sun-setting a program. Realistically, you should be able to thoroughly focus on one vital synagogue activity within about 18 months and generate a detailed action report with recommendations and modifications. At the same time, there are ways in which you can easily collect data on some discrete programs or processes in order to acquire quick, helpful feedback on other aspects of synagogue life.

For example, you might decide it’s time to assess the supplementary (now called, “complementary”) education program for children in kindergarten through sixth grades. But, just because your synagogue is engaged in this large effort, you can still be learning about the impact of other programs or processes in a more general way.

To drill down further, let’s say that a core group of 15 adults attend a four-part lecture series on Kabbalah and Jewish spirituality. As a part of each session, you ask participants to answer the same five questions at the end of class. You also leave room for them to add anything else that they would like to about the program and, on the last session, you also ask for their feedback about the entire series. You’ll be pleasantly surprised how much you will learn about what aspects of the series work well and what aspects need modification. And—you’ll be able to get all of that information with little effort on your part and the part of the participants.

Another illustration: a group of parents are leaving with their pre-school age children from a family education program. Five members of the pre-school committee are stationed at the synagogue exit. They are charged with asking two questions to as many parents as they can: “what did you like about the program,” and “what do you wish was different?” You haven’t systematically evaluated the program, but you are able to get useful feedback without much effort.

Creating a culture of assessment requires balance. You don’t want to drop assessment of every other activity during an assessment of a major area of synagogue life, while you also don’t want to drive people insane because you’re always asking them assessment-type questions. So here’s how I’d like us to help each other enrich one another with creative ideas about assessment:

  1. What areas of synagogue life lend themselves to a simple, quick assessment?
  2. How would go about getting it?

Share your ideas and I’ll be happy to compile a list.

Thank you,

Rabbi Herring

Image from Flickr, canonsnapper

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Print this article!
5 Comments

3 Comments

  1. Kerry Olitzky  •  Sep 25, 2009 @11:22 am

    Assessment is ok as long as it doesnt disrupt the experience itself. In addition, I want to be sure that the assessment takes into consideration the continuum of Jewish life and is not limited to the same set of 3 or 4 rituals that demographers commonly use to get a pulse on ritual observance. Furthermore, often if you scratch beneath the surface of many programs, especially for youth and young singles, success is related to issues of intermarriage and their prevention. I think, by the way, this is what keeps many young people away as well.

  2. hherring  •  Sep 26, 2009 @6:55 pm

    There’s no reason for assessment to intrude into an experience when it’s done well. Even when someone is evaluating a program as an observer, that person should ideally be able to blend into the background.

    Also, I want to separate two issues. One is “measuring Jewish identity,” and there you’re correct. Often, very narrow parameters are used for defining what that means. On the other hand, the kind of assessment that I’m referring to relates to measuring the impact of programs and processes–are they working toward advancing the mission of the congregation.

  3. Jim Egolf  •  Oct 1, 2009 @7:31 pm

    Regarding assessment (now that I dig out) it seems that a useful tool we have developed would best be found in Pirkei Avot chapter 5:12-18. When we look at things we have begun to ask the questions, “What was well planned and went well? What was well planned and went poorly? What was not well planned, but well received, and the fourth, what was not planned well and did not go well?” Assessment, though has a tendency to be used and abused when it becomes a sledgehammer with which to assault a part of the congregation (or a professional). While I understand the useful and necessary use of assessment, I wonder how such a tool is used to drive nails rather than to drive home a particular persons or group of peoples agenda.

    Too much of our organization life has no meaningful feedback. Yet, at what point does feedback cripple, disaffect, and become destructive in congregational life? Can quick assessment not lead to quick judgments? (and) What would assessment look like if it were the total aggregate taken in by all involved as opposed to a small group?

2 Trackbacks

Leave a Reply

Allowed tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>